even if that were true, how does endangering the lives of other make it ok?
Do you want them to adopt your culture? What about Sikhs? Mennonite women, Jewish men and women, etc. do not bear your point.
I'm sorry about the warm d coke, it sounds like a nightmare!
That's between them and their "god." I don't believe any such thing exists, so I don't care what its rules are.
Are your still threatened by science?
At age 13 you demanded to be in a serious relationship?
ELYAH Jude Alexander.
Nobody is on his own. We either listen to the voice of conscience or we reject it.
Talk to your fellow socialist jim_hitler in this threadnyou two jave a lot in common
I know that's what you people want. Youve all been trying so hard to get them banned. None of you fool me. Like i said, im not just going to hand them over.
Of course....it was Obama before, and it would have been Clinton, if only. But Trump gets no credit for anything. Got it. How blind could I be?
Like the frog in the slowly heating saucepan who doesn't realize the temperature rising until too late...
So we only disagree about God
The events where God set the serpent in to deceive?
A better comparison would be an all-white school firing a teacher when they find out the teacher has a certain amount of non-white genetics.
He perhaps wanted to be accepted...but ultimately got rejected....by everyone. Banned by Harlem Shake and hopefully soon he'll lose his job at Rutgers.
Oh really? Awesome!
"Rational thinking" requires faith in the logical system one is using. Faith is already embedded in the process.
There is an ancient saying.
Journalism just got easier.
A role model for all young capitalists!
Since you mention 1 Corinthians ?let?s look at I Corinthians: First Corinthians was probably written around 55 CE. It was written mainly to deal with some practical problems that were besetting the Christian community in Corinth. There were problems of cases of sexual immorality (5:1-13), legal issues (6:1-11), issues relating to marriage and singlehood (7:1-40), acceptability of consuming meat offered to idols (8:1-13; 10:1-11:1), issues regarding prophecy and speaking in tongues (11:2-16) and how the rich were relating to the poor (11:18-22). Yet even here Paul was also facing problems with his mission. There are two passages in this epistle where Paul felt compelled to defend his apostleship. The first is:
The cake vs gay couples case? Lol.
If they were friends, why not just do it as a favor? Sound more like acquaintances to me.
Billy doesn't seem to appreciate the value in/of debate. I guess s/he's mad about something. ;)
Correct. I am glad you understand that if everything is explained by science, the sequence goes like this:
Kicked out of seminary?!? ??