And they all pulled themselves up by their bootstraps!
Nobody considers themselves 'glorious, selfish hedonists.' Asking such a question means that one has to define what precisely this means, and of course, nobody will agree on exactly where they want to draw the line between 'hedonist' and 'non-hedonist', etc.
Funny how you have no problem ridiculing Christians but will delete a comment that merely states a terrorist shouted allahu akbar. The tragic irony of all this is that you are going out of your way to defend a misogynistic death cult that treats women appallingly and they would happily rape and murder you for being a western woman.
ill bet you'd have the best crown ,ever!
A good friend who is a high school administrator took a promotion that sent him from the most affluent school in the district, to the poorest, and after 2 weeks said to me, "these poor bastards don't have a chance!" The attitude instilled in them by parents, society, peers and the system have left them completely without hope, and people who don't know that they have options, don't have options. They are doomed to be the next generation of welfare recipients.
Of Jesus. Mark and Thomas both don't mention the resurrection.
heathen babies? babies which he created ? not your's to complain about!!! :( LOL!!!
Answer to scenario 1: Presenting a receipt from the bank that you withdrew money, tells no one later what happened to it. All you have is your claim of what happened; not evidence that you were robbed of it.
Please tell me how a lower tax economy will kill jobs? Plus if you like government spending, Dougie apparently has the biggest deficit of them all. The biggest problem under Ford will not be lack of jobs, but lack of workers.
Would the prophecy have been less true if Israel became a nation in 1983? 1822? Had not yet become a nation?
Maybe you're looking at the whole subject the wrong way. If you take the bible out of the equation altogether and rely on your knowledge of science, history and some of the bible, perhaps your faith will be stronger.
Gingers have no souls.
More of nothing.
You mean religees.
Again, I have to ask, who decides if you "know your stuff"?
Being pro-science doesn't require you to do everything that sciences says is good for you or to weigh everything to a nicety in the scales of "greatest benefit". Science tells me it's not good to eat a chocolate bacon eclair, but I'll be damned if I'm not going to once in a great while.
The holy Eucharist far more than a "symbol"!!
i doubt that you know more.
An employer should be free to fire you for any reason they want, (within the legal limits respecting protected classes and discrimination laws where they apply, and they do not apply in the Catholic school case) ; the job and position belong to the employer not the employee.
i don't think that that's a good idea XD
Certain pottery shards and coins found at the cite date to to the first century BCE. There are specific shards of pottery that date to, at the latest, the 50s CE. The town existed in in the first century BCE and the early first century CE - at least if we're basing our views on the archaeological evidence that's been found on the site.
Hah, great answer. I often take the bait and soon remember that if there's no real evidence for something you won't have any hard evidence against it either.
Sure, as in a subjective feeling. Probably plenty of people find you 'nasty' as well. It doesn't really mean anything more than being disliked by a cat or dog.
Wrong. Stuff exists, and we don't know how it originated, therefore
I think the reverse.
Incorrect. What happened to you to 'make' you heterosexual? (That is an assumption, of course.)
Then your statement is meaningless. What exactly do you claim, if anything? What is the statistics?