You mean thanks Obama don't you.
Faith in God makes billions happy. It did it for me as well. Not anymore. It makes you happy. Even though you are a liberal/progressive Christian of which the more literal kind would consider hardly one at all. Just imagine if you actually believed the whole Bible instead of the parts that suit your apologetic logic.
He should claim to identify as Genderfluid, and state that he actually enjoys wearing women's lingerie, call Sharoni a Transphobe and then demand a complete apology.
I've never contradicted the following statement:
It's an odd friendship, to look for an underhanded way to make money. :/
Your dad had something to do with it also. But this is
"Paul has no knowledge that Jesus had a ministry, Paul doesn't say anything about Jesus's baptism by John, Jesus's temptation in the wilderness, his selection of disciples, his miracles, his healings, his exorcisms, his conflicts with his own family and scribes, Pharisees, and priests, his parables, his all-important teachings on the Kingdom, his classic sermon on the mount, his teaching on / interpretation of / the Law, his semi-vocation as a carpenter, or even his spectacular raising of Lazarus."
Be a fitting end.
Well- he was right about one thing... the Degree isn't worth the paper it's printed on lol.
Yeah I know but thats how it went for Trump his dad's pull an $$$ . Bush 43 served in NG but dad being ambassador to France pulled strings to keep him stateside . It's was who u knew an money we can keep this up alnight but thats is the truth an on record
Read a book Landsnark before you make yourself look foolish.
I don't think that my religious beliefs end my search for truth. But where religious beliefs have done this, I agree it is a bad thing.
From the OP:
Two things here: one, then you'd not be deemed a killer/murderer right? So if you never act on killing, you can't be deemed a killer. Ergo, how can you be called a racist if you never showcase that behavior? Two, a wish to kill someone is a desire - it's not a philosophy or attitude that one subscribes to. What we believe typically influences how we act and react to certain situations.
That is incorrect. Proselytizing is speech and it is protected by the 1st Amendment, subject to the normal restrictions. e.g. a student could not use the public address system to do so; could not use power granted him/her by the school to 'force' someone to listen.
It is beyond human comprehension.
That is not the definition of agnostic, no... that's just sitting on the fence so long that you've become a fencepost.
the ndp will increase the PST, FOR SURE.
Can't or won't? My guess is the latter.
Funny but his buddy Donnyboy respected her enough to shag her & even to spend an entire evening watching Shark Week with her.
Funny you ain?t got no glow round ye
I feel like Jim could take up this mantle
If what you say is true then Jesus has a bad weekend. That's it. No sacrifice at all.
You've not offered anything even remotely close to help.
No, people bored with your crap logic and slippery semantics just give up even trying to bother.
All things that physically exist are functions;
It has been proven that there was no spy placed in Rumps campaign and they did their job as they should have.
Your problem is I don't care about anything you say or think. You're nothing to me.
There is an enraging quality to someone who is just too stubborn to see the plain truth. My advice to anyone who can't deal with that: just walk away. The trolls will eat your brain.
Well, I explained why it was wrong. It does not follow from basic probability. For one thing, one can have an absence of evidence simply because of a lack of attempt to try. One can have a lack of evidence because of a failure to understand what constitutes evidence. There are many reasons why there may be a lack of evidence.
My Dad used to eat Limburger cheese and I swear to God I have seen flies fall dead on the floor when he opened the package....
I hope you are human. Are you sure you understood the question?