SO people should just not love and not be in relationships if they love the same sex?
There is nothing they take more pleasure in, than dragging another human soul closer and into Hell. It?s their M. O.
Ballsy for now
It is embarrassing to see people saying unborn children are not human beings.
Cool cus i have less hair than the first guy??
We are speaking the Creation listed in the bible here. Although as there is zero evidence of Jesus's resurrection, there is nothing to debunk. Its just a wild claim.
I hope the election is fair
The APA, along withnevery other legit, non homophobic group condems it as harmful.
I'm pro-life, but I only expect my view to apply to myself, pretty much. It's really only because of a simple reason. People argue about the validity of a life based on the stage it's in. I was at that stage once, so I would not dismiss a fetus as not being a person. As far as it being illegal, I can't say that it should be, as I think it takes a mental/psychological toll far worse than being put in jail. That's really between you, your partner, God, etc. With the exception of late term abortions. That is the most horrible thing to behold, if it is done just as a choice, versus it being done bc it threatens the life of the mother, or something is really wrong with the baby.
So, special pleading. When people are good, it's because they're Christian. When they're bad, it's because they're people.
If we are all god, why do we need god?
The idea that sexual is better than asexual is all hindsight. After all, it was evolution that ingeniously came up with this idea and perfected it, right? It could have easily done the same for asexuality. After all, evolution can make things evolve for the better. And seeing there are just is as much advantage as disadvantage for both, so it's not necessarily as simple as, nature just lead us here. If evolution is true, I can see diversity in sexuality: both sexual and asexual and maybe even bisexual and trisexual among virtually all the species! Why is evolution limited? Natural selection shouldn't mean natural elimination, yet for a legacy theory's sake we are forced to believe that.
What are Tanakh reconstructionists?
What? So, using the "Twinkie Defense?" Get serious.
I met a mushroom who spoke like you.....it was in an interesting argument with a rock at the time.
Hawking has it backward, "One can't prove that God doesn't exist but science makes God "NECESSARY".
Try again, this time with a view to intelligibility.
There is no heaven.
Your last line there is not a "side note", it's the key to understanding him. So take what time you need to figure out a reading that has him making sense. And in the meantime, refrain from making judgments about what you have not yet figured out.
I am afraid you didn't get the central point of that text: God created the Universe. Its further development, including planets, stars and galaxies was as designed.
Why wait? You and I don't have to do anything. We are not on the committee (or at least I'm not, are you?)
I use to read a lot of R.L Stine and Christopher Pike in the early 90s. I also found my mom's old copies of V.C. Andrews in the basement...that umm..introduced me to some new things.
Economics back me up. Trade wars are not good for anyone. Nothing to do with social justice, so your rhetorical label is misplaced. Nice try, though.
I do! People still don't like it when I call them out for theirs though :)
My country, the UK, is far far worse since people have left Christianity. Moral values have plummeted, honesty is rare, kindness to others isnt common, integrity is rare now as well. Its very sad to see what has happened here in the last 50 or so years.
Lactose isn't a person (those).