"In the coming years evolution is going to have so many holes shot through it by discoveries ....."
In context, "biblical" means NT salvation theory as applied to a human sacrifice, namely Jesus - not to the ancient Israelite sacrificial system about which the Jewish Bible is itself ambiguous.
only if you let them.
Check the Post Office, his picture might be on the wall.
Even more ironically, Paul didn't write this verse at all. It was written in his name by a mid-2nd-century impostor who wrote 1 & 2 Timothy & Titus. The real Paul distinguished between some things in his letters that were "from the Lord" and others that weren't (1 Cor. 7:10-13).
You are not countering what I said.
What? How dare you. You are going to just call me racist and leave? Please prove it.
Children don't have sexual desires. They have attraction, Granted. But that hardly explains homosexuality, now does it? Besides, not all sexually abused children are gay, and not all gays were sexually abused as children. I have been attracted to females from as far back as I can remember, nothing 'made' me straight.
"if" is the important word here. If they choose to, but e-verify does not allow a company to investigate provided material. They may choose to not willing employ those who they find out are illegal, but they can't look into it according to the e-verify policy.
Care to share some examples where that is demonstrated? Or maybe even some studies?
Unless you can demonstrate the underlying cause, you cannot say with certainty that they are born with it.
Excuses for intolerance that people are trying to encode into law. Still the same origins.
Atheists are narcissistic.
SoS. As I said before I read all your post earlier went back 4 years, then you took a two year break and I saw the repetitive patterns and the same phrases being used. I posted about this previously .
Ahhh good point! Possibly :)
Btw God didn?t apply this verse to Jesus, the church did. Its obvious no one would have ever related it to Jesus. Matthew probably didn?t write that. Wonder why the gentile Luke never connects these events to Jesus? birth? Probably because he saw the prophecy had nothing to do with someone born 700 years later!
Now perhaps, but at the time it may have been pretty clear and straight forward.
they are an excellent stand in for extracurricular animals
Yes, NT relayed to me what was said to Angie. That might have been a marginally acceptable comment coming from one of her friends, but not from a complete stranger. She was right to delete it.
I do hope you are on here in November so I can say? I told you so ?
Fair enough. Again, my knowledge of psychology is rather cursory, so I think I'm not saying I have the answers, I'm saying this is something that perhaps is worthy of greater study or understanding- how women cope with rejection vs. men. I'd imagine that someone has already done quite a bit of leg work on the topic.
It is NOT an atheist bible. Claiming it is shows your intellectual dishonesty.
That 90% polling come from the same groups that predicted a Hillary victory?