No, they are all tricks, some incredibly amazing and mind blowing, but tricks none the less. There are many that will not reveal the secrets, but freely admit they are simply well designed well practiced tricks.
"If the theists here did not preach their opinions to the world and had the secure faith of, oh say the Amish, then the skeptics would not need to counter the nonsense of the ancient ignoramuses, would we?"
I actually agree!
God didn't choose this system, the 3 rebels in Eden did. Issues were raised against Gods sovereignty in Eden. God is letting it be proved wrong.
Have you seen it?
How does that apply to single-celled creatures?
Mine always tries to up sell me.
I read this article the other day lol.
LOL indeed - it's only the point you've been harping on throughout this "conversation", in your own words. Perhaps you think insulting me will cause me to overlook the fact that you've failed to substantiate your argument several times now. Or will you yet drone on again about how your family is all lawyers and you work with and speak for all scientists?
At best, even if it were Biblical scripture to separate politics from religion, good luck trying to convince the majority of Christians the truth of that statement. They cherry-pick their beliefs from that and that includes choosing to ignore whatever is inconvenient for them. For example, if I had a dollar for all the people who simultaneously believe the Bible is 100% infallible, all the while committing adultery, murdering, coveting other people's possessions, wearing mixed fabrics, beards, and tattoos, yet are stuck on the "gays are icky" part to the exclusion of literally everything else god says he's against, I'd be a rich person.
Lmao I went to go comment, and it was like DENIED BENCH. I was like, le gasp... well excuse me.
you don't follow what you mean
I heart you for this post... sigh, the White House is such an eye sore now. I hate walking near it.
The EU are not US friends? Is that because they will not over over every US flip flop?
Do tell. How are Dems far more interested in law or even patriotism than in maintaining power?
Yeah, electric kettles are super convenient. Probably the #1 advantage they have over stovetop kettles is they're "set and forget". They heat the water then turn themselvess off. So you can, for example, put the kettle on during an ad break, then pop out the following ad break to make the tea/coffee. And if you forget to go back or get distracted, no harm done.
In this case, we're back to square one - a global catastrophic event should've left global evidence of all kinds - geological, biological, historical, etc. Which we don't observe.
Of course he understands economics he is a businessman and that is his bread and butter. Contrary to what you think Trump is very smart and he runs circles around the left and they don't even know it. I dare you to look up Trump's achievements which the left refuse to report about.
Yes, he clearly knew right from wrong and chose wrong.
As an example
Not at all. You're too humble. And now your Trollishness may have the last word. Open season: say what you will. I have tired of this conversation and will not respond.
Ok so the sloth gets eaten by another animal that needs to eat. It?s called the circle of life. Watch the Lion King if you don?t understand this concept. Nature is beautiful. Life is beautiful. God is good.
The Heat has a coach at least and a better supporting cast
How is that possible? You've shown us pictures of you sitting down at your desk. Or have you?
In trying to prove your assertion that god designed the species, you cannot use the statement that god intended species to change. They have changed, for reasons not yet agreed upon. Do you agree they change?
Also, it's NOT even a gish gallop, because there's only one argument. I think you're equating 4 separate quotes or wordcount or separator lines or 7 questions to being arguments, but it's just one over-riding argument. That is "are anti-theists reluctant to accept changes to evolutionary theory for fear of creationists scoring points" or however you want to see it. The answer appears to be yes.
Ive had people tell me
Do you think that this video demonstrates my own identity as false?
Believers like the author keep saying there is no evidence for common descent a scientific conclusion derived from the evidence discovered yet are perfectly okay accepting that a dead Jew came back to life on without any evidence. The gospels, the gospels . . . yes the gospels are the claim not the evidence. So what is the scientific evidence that resurrection is possible. Just an FYI to the author, "Test the prophecy" is not scientific evidence.
I wanted to see how far he would've pushed it. But believe it, I would've if he became any sassier...
I mean, how can she resist?! Someone on the internet willing to admit they're wrong? Inconceivable!
I do not judge. I describe. I tell the truth.