You can have a box or sheet cake and avoid bigoted bakers and the added cost of set up and take down. Or you can have this and roll the dice.
Not wasting my time combing through my posts or yours looking for things you and I both know you have said.
Some people claim that this makes possible a form of non-Darwinian evolution, since the hereditary changes are actually caused by the environment, but there's not a whit of evidence of any adaptation that arose in this way. And, there's no evidence that environmentally induced changes in DNA can persist beyond a few generations, making this "neo-Lamarckian" evolution very unlikely. Finally, when you actually map evolutionary differences between species, adaptive or otherwise, you invariably find that they map to changes in the DNA sequence, not to changes in "methylation" of DNA bases?the oft-cited source of the "environmental modification" of DNA. What we have is a lot of sizzle and no steak. POOF
I'm not sure exactly what you are implying mate.
I cry when I'm frustrated and/or angry. Every freaking time.
I do not care what YOU think about anything.
Socrates? ; )
"some people can disagree without being antagonistic" this is so important. My favorite is people who know they're an antagonistic asshat yet they play the victim when the pile-up occurs and they're outnumbered. It's like ok,sweetie,you're allowed to have an opinion but you're not allowed to be a condescending jerk about it.
Statistically you are less likely to be divorced because vast majority of atheists are middle age and older white men. Women don?t like you
It's weird, I understand everyone's point of view here including his. Which is my wife went through a terrible time and finally gets some good news and you pull this after she shares it
The questions could have been asked in the context of a theology presupposed true. Not sure that it leads anyone to a better understanding but it might be an interesting thought experiment- why a personal god would act in a specific manor.... but without some caveats it's premises are nearly entirely fallacious.
I have read numerous articles discussing Trump's alleged incessant prevarications, yet it's never mentioned that the press is even better at said prevarication. Trump is the one castigated and held to a higher standard, that his opposition is never held to.
with cream cheese icing OMG.
I note you have to avoid engaging with my arguments in order to sustain yours.
At least you gave it a "1". That means (to me) you are a reasonable person.
You're right, the court case wasn't about indoctrination.
I can say I hope he's humbled....defeated....ashamed.....
A poster on another thread just told me that it?s god who decides skin colour.
a fool and his errand....
Well, let's be clear - - - it wasn't LITERALLY from "nothing". Jehovah simply "created" it. Perhaps from HIMSELF, there! But point being, Jehovah God is the one who created 'the atom; the electron; chemicals, elements, etc etc' He created it FROM "NOTHING". I know, I know, you're really confused now. That's OK, so am I. I guess that comes with the territory of us being "humans", with very little understanding things outside of what we're familiar with. Does that make more sense?
And yet it isn't. You draw forth meaning from words that I didn't put there.
If you still can't see the problem with your argument, you will have to accept the mocking.