Inquiring minds want to know
It's not wrong. What's the error range on a 4000 year old sample? You clearly don't have a clue what radiometric dating is, or how it works.
Where's the rip?
Who are "some people"? In this OP they seem to be made mostly of straw.
YES-- we have only one form of success. I agree with everything you said. These kids are not in school to learn, they are institutionalized to keep them out of our way and so they can become productive workers someday. The emphasis is not on helping them to develop as humans but getting them the right scores to get into the right school so they can get a job someday and buy big ticket items.
Most of the Trump supporters that I know don't need to change the story because they don't care about the story. They don't care if Trump is a liar, or a criminal, or a traitor, or a moron. None of those things matter to them as long as Trump is still in office representing THEM.
You're welcome, Melli! : )
And how do my conversational skills impair your ability to explain what you are talking about?
I haven't read the book, but I'm certainly interested in doing so now. Karen Armstrong hasn't really been given to too much hyperbole in her other books, so your description surprised me.
No one should be sexually harassed and I'm glad all of this is coming to the surface. Women are mothers, sisters, daughters, nieces, etc. Think about that and would you want harm to come to any of them?
It looks like it's going to be the couch.
of course, we don't. people don't just agree with whatever you consider 'obvious'.
Ah, but if it were really true that if Christianity wasn't going anywhere, you wouldn't be sounding alarm-bells about its decline, would you? ??????
That's what I said!
Noble gave an obvious example, which is what what his whole quote is about -- another scientist saying that he can't agree with any proposal that lacks a full enough explanation as to explicitly exclude theist ideas. Gould brings atheism into it by talking about Dawkins, whose "self-styled Darwinian fundamentalism" is both reductionist and pretty clearly tied to his strong atheistic views.
If you REALLY mean that, don't you think you would become a better person if you put that faith in YOU and not in a faceless god?
You are saying that 1970's (and before) "news" WASN'T propaganda?
Preserving the rights and freedoms for EVERYONE is not overreaching.
I think it is encased in shatter proof glass now. ?? ??
So, what do you consider "the heaves" to be? It is specifically narrowing down to "the earth," the planet specific to the upcoming narrative. So what would be your take on "the heavens" meantiomes prior to the mention of the earth if not the overall universe?
I really think anyone who makes up false sexual attacks, when caught should spend as much time in jail as the offence that they are claiming
I have explained it to others, and they have understood. But it was God alone Who makes it evident to them, as He does for me also.
Stupid people tend to believe both.
Dude's a bigot. If baking a cake is participating, then baking cupcakes is just as much participating.
Apologies - I had thought that my posts were clear. I not only accept that there are the things you list that do not sit well with me but I actually have stated that I would defend someone's right to practice those things within certain constraints, constraints already elucidated.
Einstein vs Stephen Hawking!