But you're just saying that it's "random ... misery". You're really just whining, Wayne. You may have excellent reason to whine, I don't know, but you're deliberately painting things in the worst possible way, which is unhealthy. If I know anything, it's that God cannot be manipulated, so you might as well give it up and accept reality for what it is. It ain't gonna change. You either come to terms with God as he is, or you make yourself miserable.
I agree but wasn't aware anyone was taking it to court. It's just people on both sides expressing their views.
Well it appears to be the case that we both live in the 21st century currently. The ToE is well supported and accepted by 90% of the world while Christianity is accepted by 2 billion people out of 7.4 billion. It seems people have looked at your claim and determined in is without warrant/justification.
When it counts he is often more goat than Greatest Of All Time
I'm actually going to take on your questions here, even the extremely loaded question #1, because I do see two common threads between them: OP misrepresenting the way science works, and OP holding science to an unrealistic standard. Here we go:
Obama paid Iran $400 million for those prisoners... I wouldn't want a reminder of that either.
It was such a hard code though. ??
Not my position.
What? A child is a human that has been born.
You are a moderator?
Yes, let?s count. How many people have been killed in the name of a god versus how many have been killed in the name of atheism.
Now its fresh n cleen
Lol! I have a similar story. I just needed a guy that made me feel safe enough to show that side.
Please. Don't use that bullshit about Einstein to propagate your religious insanity. He never admitted he was wrong about religion. And what he considered his greatest blunder basically obliterated religion and redefined physics all over again. What he did do is what most great scientists up until about the 1990's did. They endeared themselves slightly to religion so that regardless of what occurs their work will endure because religious zealots won't dismiss their work as godlessness. Newton, Da Vinci, and many, many others did exactly the same.
So true. I see this all the time on here. Also, many atheists try to argue that there is no god by pointing out how "terrible" god is.
You make no sense
Why? I believe God reveals Himself in the details for a reason. Its circumstantial evidence of God, to allow us to choose. The only way you reject circumstantial evidence is of you accept other circumstantial evidence. But, truthfully we all know the breadcrumbs lead to a creator God. Its shying away from that, bit eventually you must answer to that.
No trolling there.
right now, i wouldn't trust anything they do...still wonder how many will be ticketed even after 20 days!!!
Please describe this "god" you ask about;
Nah, don't be so negative. I'm sure she's just looking for a love connection here and nothing more. A wealthy Nigerian a while back left a comment here at BN asking for help to transfer a large sum of money and offered to pay handsomely for any assistance. Even though people were skeptical of that poor guy, turns out all he needed was my bank account info and he was quite friendly about it. He was so nice I provided my help for free.
If society were to look upon religion as a affliction, and saw the problem with a certain compassion, we could rid ourselves of the negative aspects of religion without harming the afflicted.
You're bull shitting, hope so at least. You voted for DoFo.
Could be. As a typical leftist, God is the last thing on his mind, and secularism/statism is his religion.
His story is like many others. Many.
A theist is someone that believes in a god. An atheist is someone that does not believe in a god. If a baby has no concept of a god then they, by default, do not believe in a god. That would make them an atheist.
I echo what everyone has said. Take someone with you. Meet in public. Stay in a hotel. I hope she has video chatted with them before.
you made the claim you had a point. I just don't see it.
Again, it seems you do not have a grasp of what "free speech" is or what it is all about.
Why should anyone accept a poor flawed argument? It's better to just say I believe on faith or personal revelation.
And why does that mean that their families must be forcibly separated? Does justice need to be cruel? If so it is not justice.
I used to request it a lot when younger, but would stop if uncomfortable. And now I wait until my SO requests - she did for a number of years, but not very much lately. And when she did, it was (as mentioned) very intense and pleasurable for both parties.