This one's not an either/or. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, but why use one when you can use both? Religion wants to catch ALL the flies.
KILL this crowd Curry
Keep it civil, Denki. Telling people to F off is not ok on this channel
Not once we get our matching feline onesieeeeeeeees ??!
Ovechkin wins the Conn Smythe
Please pass this on before they ban me..... Again ..... THE POPE HAS ACCEPTED HOMOSEXUALITY!!! Just the past week he tolled Homosexuals that God made them this way and that God loves them..... Please pass this on you can Google it and its on the news.... My question is of two parts.. Isn't the Pope he contradicting the bible??? And more so dose that mean all the other popes that said it was a sin was wrong??? Please pass this on too all you know.
Yes, our Orange Miscreant would be happiest at a table with Mussolini, Hitler, Franco and Pol Pot. Democratically-elected leaders of progressive advanced modern societies offend his sensibilities.
Deflection, side stepping, tap dancing. Is this Kellyanne Conway? LOL
I always thought those just screamed "I'm ambiguously gay".
I've always wondered that too. It kind of makes me go eek inside, and my hands and arms feel funny.
Point noted. He had Male dna but did not have Adam's line.
So do some research, you ignoramus. It's all right at your fingertips. Learn how to use internet for more than just trolling and jerking off to porn and you'll be better for it. Amazing. You've got the whole world and the information therein at your fingertips and you still choose to remain ignorant. Who am I kidding, here -
You don?t really understand what you?re asking. Anybody can be a vampire, if they drink blood from others, or animals. Vampirism is about consuming blood.
So two wrongs make a right, do they?
Data is out there. Ignore it if you like.
No, my argument is that everything that physically exists is a function of the big bang. There is nothing that physically exists that is not a function of the big bang (you are welcome to see the big bang as a single event if you like, it does not matter). Somehow you want to posit "self creating stuff" or something arising by itself after the big bang, but I am pointing out that whatever exists that you claim is not a function, would not exist except for the big bang.
The bible says that the unsaved people's minds and hearts have been blinded by Satan or the god of this world so they cannot see the TRUTH in the gospel or Jesus Christ as the Savior. So as long as the unsaved remain in spiritual blindness there is no proof of God or Christ they will accept. Until the unsaved, the atheists or the agnostics or whoever open their minds and hearts then they can received the Truth. But if they never open their minds and hearts then they will forever be blinded.
Having a discussion about what you want out of a relationship doesn't negate the choice. Haranguing and nagging is not the same as a discussion! lol
I guess this hole must be of different shape and size, depending in which century and country folk were born in. There have been so many gods created by humankind to help in their fear of death, to bring the rain, alleviate the pain of poverty and disease. Yet we still die, the rain doesn't come and poverty and disease are still with us.
Would the prophecy have been less true if Israel became a nation in 1983? 1822? Had not yet become a nation?
One used pipeline only 60 years old...what a bargain at $4.5 Billion er ah um, make that at leat $10.5 Billion.
Not exactly - that's why I put my moral objection in parentheses. It's not really an argument that a creator deity doesn't exist - it's an argument that, speaking for myself, if a creator deity was proven to exist, I would not respect or adore it. Which, in my book, makes it less than a "true God".
Yes. The first implies we've reviewed the evidence and are withholding belief until that changes.
DT. Sweet, How I envy those that can offer their deep thoughts with short, clear and concise phrasing.
Check one by one!
You answered your own question with the "but...".
Tell them you're also not human RUDY BOT!
Non-sequitur. (C) does not necessarily follow from either (P).
Tautological definition. And... not important for the purposes of this OP.
Most certainly not. My point is that simply separating families or prosecuting criminals is not necessarily a violation.
The APA, along withnevery other legit, non homophobic group condems it as harmful.