You can?t move the goal posts after I scored.
Again and again : PROVE IT or leave the argument.
Nuts. Occam's Razor and probability suggests gods either don't exist or if they do exist, they couldn't care less.
Timeless falsehoods have a history also.
All of history is just establishing levels of probability. We could never conclude with *certainty* that Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by the Roman Senate - but it's extremely probable.
A bunch of Levantine bronze age guys borrow some myth from earlier Mesopotamian Bronze age guys, and now in the 21st century after thousands of years of advancement, you think those Bronze Age myths are literal truth and everything learned since then is wrong. And yet somehow you can manage to use the internet, which depends on that science you fear. Amazing.
Faith requires no proof. So no physical can be provided.
Like the national anthem, or pledge of allegiance?
Yikes!! I'm so sorry!! I've never had to deal with anything like this but I wanted to send my sympathies to you...hopefully everything will be better than new and back to normal quickly!
What we've established is that you don't know the difference between a deistic god and a personal one, the relationship between Christianity and deism, or between deism and philosophical theism. We've established that you have little or perhaps no knowledge of the linguistic properties of the terms at hand, of the theology either of clerics or laypeople, or of the intellectual history of the concepts you purport to discuss. What we've learned is that you carefully employ ambiguity to avoid taking responsibility for the content of your ideas, as you've done both in terms of "omnipotence" as well as epistemology. We've learned that despite your pretense at scientific sophistication you seem to have little appreciation for the basic concepts involved. Above all, however, you've demonstrated your reflexive incapacity to hold yourself to your own standards.
I said all religions are political. They get involved in abortion, gay rights etc. That makes them political in that sense. But there involvement is religiously motivated. In other words they use their religious text to justify their position.
the only real difference is TIME
Remember when you made excuses for priests who fucked boys?
So much wrong...
The right to discriminate based on certain characteristics is not deemed a right worthy of protection in a society based on equality of gender, religion, ethnicity, etc.
Again, you sum up a billion people by the actions of a few. Surely you are good with all atheists being tarred with the 100 million plus bodies associated with atheist materialists and their communist "end justifies the means" ideology? No?
First, I don't think the golden rule is the best moral philosophy, since many people want to be treated different than I might.
Yeah, Carson Wentz!
that last sentence is sooo sexy,, miss Y
That sounds right to me. Probably best to balance all versions of the story in your head. All the shades of gray. All the possibilities.
No, no, no. How certain are you?
Big and small dogs can happily play together. I recall one time when I was visiting an ex-girlfriend who had one quite large dog and one very small dog, she told me about one time when she went outside to see what they were doing, because they were so quiet.
It?s closer to ?homosexual sex while also having straight sex?... at least in one verse.
Except he isn't a part of their relationship.
yes, cause the idiot right loves these culture war stories
Never said requirement, nice try to mince words and make a big word salad,
Let it go, man. It's only hurting you.
which did you experience first?
That was a weird comment. Evolution isn't a settled science - the core is about as verified as a scientific theory can be but there's refinement going on around the edges all the time.
Keep them away ??????