Here you go:
Huh? It's a fact genomes are dynamic. Its no fact its cumulative. In fact, many doubt gradualism and doubt natural selection...like I said in the op.
True, and the King before Elizabeth abdicated for one, I like that! But actors weren't considered proper, in Elizabeth's generation and before, but times change. And when the King married Wallace-Simpson, it was considered a scandal, she was *gasp*, a divorced woman.
agreed. Double the up votes. I would not mind working a 10 hour shift if I got a 2 hour nap in there.
Food's awfully close to litter box.
That Shape of Water is a really good watch.
The Big Bang is the beginning of expansion of the universe and not the beginning of the universe. Energy and matter were already there. Otherwise what was there to expand?
Of course there is evidence that the universe was created :
Too bad. I thought you might be able to provide more information about the CS faith healing claims. Oh well.
LOL I regretted mine
True. I'll drink to that. But it's a legal drug. Cigarettes are legal as well. I just can't see us taking all these "industries" out of the shadows, but it sure would kill the cartels and produce a lot of tax revenue. Not to mention, you know what you're getting in a bottle of booze. You don't know what you're getting with any street drug you buy. It can all be laced with fentanyl or PCP.
This old thing again.
I explained why you are feel others are only
I wish it?s the gangster. :)) HAHAHAHA I?m convinced it?s the lazy.
I think you would regret such a decision within much less than 1 hour.And opt out.Go ahead and try it.Some religious people do think that self torture is good.But they don't go so far as crucifixion.JC was already God.But suffered as a human would.
"He noted that the difference between 1998 and 2016 ? the two ?warmest? years recorded in the last two decades ? is only .02? with a margin of error of .10?."
If she knows, she really sucks and I agree they deserve each other
Sure, it's fine for you to go there if you want, I just don't happen to be interested in some generic discussion of new findings invalidating a theory. Today I'm interested in the OP and the statistical analysis that it describes. You don't have to be interested, that's fine, but it is the OP, after all.